Friday, May 22, 2009

Michelle Malkin Does Not Want Muslims In Jail

Michelle Malkin, in today's column, chastises President Obama for daring to hold Muslim terrorists in US prisons. This comes after the arrests of four homegrown terrorists. A plot that was foiled by a traditional FBI investigation, not by torture or warrentless wiretapping. A plot that was foiled over a year, not on a ticking-time-bomb. She argues that holding these men in US prisons allows the "virus" of terrorism, no wait, Muslim terrorism, to spread like wildfire.

Before I get into the meat of this argument, I would just like to give Malkin a grammar tip. When you have multiple adjectives describing a single noun, as in, "murder-minded black Muslim jailhouse converts..." commas are required in between adjectives. I know, it is so hard to use proper grammar with all that oozy hatred spewing out of your mouth.

I have long argued that the chickenhead warhawks of our nation seem utterly obsessed with Muslims. Where was Malkin when this happened:
Federal Agents arrested a former National Guardsman for allegedly planning to blow up a synagogue and a National Guard armory in Tennessee.
The only difference between this terrorism and the type that Malkin thinks has no place in our jails, is that this terrorist was white and Christian. Malkin misses, however, one major issue.

FBI Special Agent R. Joe Clark said, “Mr. Braden represents the most difficult kind of terrorist - the lone wolf.”

But that kind of terrorism is okay to have in our jails. That kind of terrorist is not a threat to hummanity in our prisons. Only the, black, Muslim, jailhouse converts (see how easy it was to use those commas), not the white, Christian, neo-Nazi, National Guard converts, are dangerous.


Oh, and as to Malkin's criticism about President Obama not talking more about this, where was she all those numerous times the Republicans refused to talk about an ongoing investigation? Is it at all possible that President Obama is waiting for all to be said and done before needlessly commenting on what appears to be a successful investigation?

No comments:

Post a Comment